Mr. Falcon
JoinedPosts by Mr. Falcon
-
116
Water Canopy? Huh?
by Mr. Falcon in*** w80 11/15 p. 23 par.
4 jehovah of armies to the rescue!
the fact that today we do not have a vast water canopy suspended high up in space and all around our globe and thus blocking direct sunlight, moonlight and starlight is because jehovah saw what was going on down here upon his terrestrial footstool and took action.
-
-
19
the story of a little old lady who loved god
by warmasasunned inheard an interesting story today of a little old lady in her nineties.
the poor old dear had been in hospitial very poorly for a few months but as soon as she was discharged, even though she was still very weak,.
she told her daughter "i must go to church on sunday".
-
Mr. Falcon
should've been a Kingdom Hall she was going to. That's why.
-
116
Water Canopy? Huh?
by Mr. Falcon in*** w80 11/15 p. 23 par.
4 jehovah of armies to the rescue!
the fact that today we do not have a vast water canopy suspended high up in space and all around our globe and thus blocking direct sunlight, moonlight and starlight is because jehovah saw what was going on down here upon his terrestrial footstool and took action.
-
Mr. Falcon
It's more likely he is a "JW Pretender"
Thanks Outlaw. What kind of sick, psycho nutjob would pretend to be a Jehovah's Witness???? You gotta be kidding me.....Dear God......
I mean I believed at first that maybe he's just a troll, but look at that comment! That's waaaay too much effort to just be a ball-breaker. This cat is nuttier than a shat-house rat.
-
116
Water Canopy? Huh?
by Mr. Falcon in*** w80 11/15 p. 23 par.
4 jehovah of armies to the rescue!
the fact that today we do not have a vast water canopy suspended high up in space and all around our globe and thus blocking direct sunlight, moonlight and starlight is because jehovah saw what was going on down here upon his terrestrial footstool and took action.
-
Mr. Falcon
@Mr. Falcon:
I think maybe it's a sign that I have to stop reading information that makes me dumber with every single line ... of irrational thought...
What information are you reading that is making you dumber?
well, for starters, your comment.
DJeggnog, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
-
15
I've got one that can see!
by Mr. Falcon inyesterday, there was a thread concerning the recent important discovery they found in the middle east.
if proven to be authentic from the correct time-period it would signify that early christians did indeed use the cross as part of their religion.
we all commented about how if this does indeed turn out to be true, the wtbs and it's jws will either shrug it off or simply come up with some bizarre conspiracy story.. so i decided to test the waters a little.
-
Mr. Falcon
Cheez! - What's the good word, my man?
Yeah, at this point in my "theocratic career" scotch is about the only thing I'm running on now. Scotch has replaced "faith". Rutherford would be proud.
-
15
I've got one that can see!
by Mr. Falcon inyesterday, there was a thread concerning the recent important discovery they found in the middle east.
if proven to be authentic from the correct time-period it would signify that early christians did indeed use the cross as part of their religion.
we all commented about how if this does indeed turn out to be true, the wtbs and it's jws will either shrug it off or simply come up with some bizarre conspiracy story.. so i decided to test the waters a little.
-
Mr. Falcon
make that "one of the worst nights", we had to go through worse stuff later. but we did so together.
Hofer - I'm sorry to hear about your stresses, but I'm glad you got to get through them together instead of letting "doctrines of men" undermine a marriage.
-
15
I've got one that can see!
by Mr. Falcon inyesterday, there was a thread concerning the recent important discovery they found in the middle east.
if proven to be authentic from the correct time-period it would signify that early christians did indeed use the cross as part of their religion.
we all commented about how if this does indeed turn out to be true, the wtbs and it's jws will either shrug it off or simply come up with some bizarre conspiracy story.. so i decided to test the waters a little.
-
Mr. Falcon
Mustard & Morbidz - haha that is funny. Never heard that one. My dear delusional mother always told me that the purpose of the dinosaurs was for them to fertilize the earth. Yup.
-
15
I've got one that can see!
by Mr. Falcon inyesterday, there was a thread concerning the recent important discovery they found in the middle east.
if proven to be authentic from the correct time-period it would signify that early christians did indeed use the cross as part of their religion.
we all commented about how if this does indeed turn out to be true, the wtbs and it's jws will either shrug it off or simply come up with some bizarre conspiracy story.. so i decided to test the waters a little.
-
Mr. Falcon
Morbidz - that sucks, I'm sorry. You just can't reason with unreasonable people. And it's nutty that they then go door-to-door and berate people for tenaciously clinging to their religious beliefs. I guess poor Jesus wasted his breath trying to teach anyone anything. Humans are a lost cause.
Misery - After she said that I just smiled and said, "Can I marry you all over again?" just kidding. I poured a double scotch.
drew - Nice to meet you too. Yeah, I am one of those poor, miserable souls who is currently being held hostage by a publishing company. I agree with you about it not being that important except to Rutherford and his minions. Rutherford was the Jehovah's Witness version of L. Ron Hubbard. (no offence to any Hubbard fans) Rutherford ruined countless people's lives for generations and set independant-thinking back to the Dark Ages.
-
25
Could recently discovered codices prove once and for all that Jesus died on a cross?
by truthseeker inthis find, if genuine, is significant.. http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thelookout/20110330/ts_yblog_thelookout/could-lead-codices-prove-the-major-discovery-of-christian-history.
how would the watchtower react if evidence suggests that jesus died on a cross?
this would mean they lied to millions of their members saying that the instrument of jesus' execution was nothing more than a stake, an upright pole.. .
-
Mr. Falcon
I decided to test the waters a little. I got home yesterday and told my wife about the story. I was careful to mention that I read the story from the BBC, so she wouldn't think that it's just some sensational apostate gibberish. Faking deep concern, I told her that if this is proven true it will make us look pretty stupid as an organization. Her response was pretty typical JW (unfortunately, I held out hope). She said "Do you really think that Jehovah would let them find something like that?" My jaw hit my shoes. So God is covering his tracks now? Is that what she's implying? It's like that scene in Goodfellas where they killed Billy Batts and 6 months later had to dig up his body because they were getting ready to build something on that property. God's apparantly going to slip out there at night and "remove" the evidence.
Then she fell back on the last refuge of a closed-minded JW: the "what does it matter what he died on" defense. Tried and true. JWs are incapable of thinking independantly or deeply about things, so the minute heavy questions start to fly, they stick their heads in the sands of ignorance. When I explained that it IS a big deal because if (IF) it is proven true, then a lot of what we teach would come into question.
Well, she then went to the second typical JW response: the "turn the tables guilt trip" defense. She tells me that it seems like I don't have faith in what we believe. At this point I realized that I'd better back off alittle. Don't want to stir the bee hive just yet. But this little experiment was interesting to me if we can use it as a guage for what the typical JW response will be if this find turns out to be the smoking gun.
-
15
I've got one that can see!
by Mr. Falcon inyesterday, there was a thread concerning the recent important discovery they found in the middle east.
if proven to be authentic from the correct time-period it would signify that early christians did indeed use the cross as part of their religion.
we all commented about how if this does indeed turn out to be true, the wtbs and it's jws will either shrug it off or simply come up with some bizarre conspiracy story.. so i decided to test the waters a little.
-
Mr. Falcon
Yesterday, there was a thread concerning the recent important discovery they found in the Middle East. If proven to be authentic from the correct time-period it would signify that early Christians did indeed use the cross as part of their religion. We all commented about how if this does indeed turn out to be true, the WTBS and it's JWs will either shrug it off or simply come up with some bizarre conspiracy story.
So I decided to test the waters a little. I got home yesterday and told my wife about the story. I was careful to mention that I read the story from the BBC, so she wouldn't think that it's just some sensational apostate gibberish. Faking deep concern, I told her that if this is proven true it will make us look pretty stupid as an organization. Her response was pretty typical JW (unfortunately, I held out hope). She said "Do you really think that Jehovah would let them find something like that?" My jaw hit my shoes. So God is covering his tracks now? Is that what she's implying? It's like that scene in Goodfellas where they killed Billy Batts and 6 months later had to dig up his body because they were getting ready to build something on that property. God's apparantly going to slip out there at night and "remove" the evidence.
Then she fell back on the last refuge of a closed-minded JW: the "what does it matter what he died on" defense. Tried and true. JWs are incapable of thinking independantly or deeply about things, so the minute heavy questions start to fly, they stick their heads in the sands of ignorance. When I explained that it IS a big deal because if (IF) it is proven true, then a lot of what we teach would come into question.
Well, she then went to the second typical JW response: the "turn the tables guilt trip" defense. She tells me that it seems like I don't have faith in what we believe. At this point I realized that I'd better back off alittle. Don't want to stir the bee hive just yet. But this little experiment was interesting to me if we can use it as a guage for what the typical JW response will be if this find turns out to be the smoking gun.
Anyone else try to mention this news story to an active JW?